Juan M. Alvarez
Yvonne Amaya

Can Works Created by Artificial Intelligence be Registered as Original?

In January 2025, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) took on a case that raised a significant question for the future of copyright law in Mexico: Can artificial intelligence (“AI”) be considered an author? The case, identified as Direct Amparo 6/2025, was brought by Gerald García Báez, who attempted to register a work titled “Virtual Avatar: Gerald García Báez” before the National Institute of Copyright (“INDAUTOR”). The work had been created with the assistance of an AI tool called Leonardo.

The applicant argued that although he had provided photographs and instructions, it was the AI that generated the final content. He therefore requested that moral rights be recognized in favor of AI, and economic rights granted to him as the user of the system. INDAUTOR denied the registration, stating that the work was not created by a human being—an essential requirement for a work to be protected under the Federal Copyright Law.

Following a series of legal challenges, the matter reached the SCJN, which currently holds, as a draft opinion, that works created by artificial intelligence cannot be registered under the existing legal framework. The Court maintains that copyright is designed to protect human creations, and that only natural persons can be recognized as authors. This is because originality, as a legal requirement, is intrinsically linked to the individuality, experience, emotions, and human context—qualities that a machine does not possess.

Furthermore, the Court explained that moral rights— such as the right to be recognized as the author or to protect the integrity of the work—are considered human rights and therefore cannot be granted to nonhuman entities such as AI. It also clarified that international law, including treaties such as the USMCA and the Berne Convention, does not require the recognition of machines as authors.

In conclusion, the current legal position in Mexico is clear: works generated by artificial intelligence cannot be registered as if they were human creations. Unless there is a legal reform that explicitly addresses this emerging technological reality, the law will continue to uphold a human-centered approach, recognizing only natural persons as authors.

Post Tags :

Share :

Read More

Recent News
June 11, 2026
Mexico’s Patent and Trademark Office (IMPI) Suspends Operations and Deadlines on June 11th, 2026, Ahead of the FIFATM World Cup Opening

Regulatory Context On June 10th, 2026, the Federal Official Gazette published a resolution issued by...

June 11, 2026
Workplace Arrangements for June 11th, 2026: Scope of the World Cup Decree

Regulatory Context On June 9th, 2026, the Federal Executive published a Decree in the Official...

June 11, 2026
UIF and CNBV Issue Joint Alert on Money Laundering and Human Trafficking Risks Related to the 2026 FIFATM World Cup

The National Banking and Securities Commission (“CNBV”) and the Financial Intelligence Unit (“UIF”) have issued...

Mexico Opens New Visa Path
June 1, 2026
Mexico Opens New Visa Path for Highly Specialized Foreign Talent

On May 15th, 2026, Mexico’s Ministry of the Interior (SEGOB) and the Ministry of Foreign...

Written by:

Partner

Juan is a Partner at Ibarra del Paso Gallego, where he specializes in Industrial Property,…

Associate

Yvonne is an Associate at Ibarra del Paso Gallego, specializing in Intellectual Property and Administrative…

We use our own and third-party cookies to optimize our website and services. Check our Privacy Notice for more information.