{"id":1493,"date":"2023-10-13T19:03:17","date_gmt":"2023-10-13T19:03:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/?p=1493"},"modified":"2025-12-23T17:17:10","modified_gmt":"2025-12-23T17:17:10","slug":"relevant-criteria-published-by-the-supreme-court-of-justice-of-the-nation-in-the-judicial-weekly-of-the-federation-on-october-13th-2023","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/relevant-criteria-published-by-the-supreme-court-of-justice-of-the-nation-in-the-judicial-weekly-of-the-federation-on-october-13th-2023\/","title":{"rendered":"Relevant Criteria Published by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, in the Judicial Weekly of the Federation on October 13th, 2023"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">In Constitutional Criminal Law<\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The First Chamber declared unconstitutional Article 142, Section I, of the Banking Institutions Law, considering that it violates the right to privacy by allowing the Attorney General of the Republic or the public servant to whom powers are delegated to request banking information from financial institutions for criminal purposes without judicial authorization.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation<br \/>\nDigital Record: 2027468<br \/>\nInstance: First Chamber<br \/>\nEleventh Era<br \/>\nSubject(s): Constitutional, Criminal<br \/>\nRuling: 1a.\/J. 150\/2023 (11th)<br \/>\nSource: Federal Judicial Weekly<br \/>\nType: Precedent<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BANKING SECRECY. ARTICLE 142, SECTION I, OF THE BANKING INSTITUTIONS LAW VIOLATES THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">In Civil Matters<\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The foundation and requirements for issuing digitally certified copies and sending them to interested parties via the institutional email of the judicial organ or public servant are continuously being established.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation<br \/>\nDigital Record: 2027431<br \/>\nInstance: First Chamber<br \/>\nEleventh Era<br \/>\nSubject(s): Civil, Common<br \/>\nRuling: 1a.\/J. 148\/2023 (11th)<br \/>\nSource: Federal Judicial Weekly<br \/>\nType: Precedent<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">DIGITALLY CERTIFIED COPIES OF JUDICIAL RECORDS. FORMALITIES TO BE OBSERVED FOR THEIR TRANSMISSION IN DIGITAL FORMAT THROUGH EMAIL.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">In Administrative and Health Matters<\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The First Chamber ruled that in the case of diseases that require periodic medication, there is a duty of diligence on the part of the State. It should adjust its health, legal, administrative, and financial institutions to prevent a violation of the human right to health.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It also ruled that this right is violated when medications are not provided to patients in a timely manner. Health institutions are obligated to plan and adopt all necessary measures to ensure that there is no shortage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Furthermore, an isolated ruling was issued stating that the IMSS (Mexican Social Security Institute) is obligated to continue providing health services, even if a child is no longer a beneficiary, especially in cases of urgency or when other public health institutions cannot efficiently provide the required services.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation<br \/>\nDigital Record: 2027440<br \/>\nInstance: First Chamber<br \/>\nEleventh Era<br \/>\nSubject(s): Administrative, Constitutional<br \/>\nRuling: 1a.\/J. 151\/2023 (11th)<br \/>\nSource: Federal Judicial Weekly<br \/>\nType: Precedent<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HUMAN RIGHT TO HEALTH. IN CASES REQUIRING PERIODIC MEDICATION, THE STATE HAS A DUTY OF DILIGENCE THAT SHOULD BE STRENGTHENED.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation<br \/>\nDigital Record: 2027438<br \/>\nInstance: Circuit Collegiate Tribunals<br \/>\nEleventh Era<br \/>\nSubject(s): Constitutional, Common<br \/>\nRuling: III.1o.A.6 K (11th)<br \/>\nSource: Federal Judicial Weekly<br \/>\nType: Isolated Ruling<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HUMAN RIGHT TO HEALTH. THE EFFECTS OF THE AMPARO (LEGAL PROTECTION) GRANTED TO ENSURE THE INSTITUTE MEXICAN SOCIAL SECURITY (IMSS) CONTINUES TO PROVIDE URGENT HEALTH SERVICES TO A CHILD SHOULD NOT BE CONDITIONED ON THEIR CONTINUED BENEFICIARY STATUS OR THE VALIDITY OF RIGHTS.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">In Labor Matters<\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Regional Plenum in Labor Matters for the Central-Southern Region ruled that it is appropriate to grant provisional suspension of the contested act with restitutory effects when the act in question is the omission of the responsible authority to proceed with the execution of an award.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In doing so, attention should be paid to the presumed bonum ius and an assessment of whether the complainant asserts a legitimate interest, whether the violation could cause them imminent and irreparable harm, and whether the execution of the award is a matter of public order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It is important to note that the suspension cannot modify or restrict rights or establish any rights that the complainant did not have before the filing of the lawsuit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation<br \/>\nDigital Record: 2027476<br \/>\nInstance: Regional Plenums<br \/>\nEleventh Era<br \/>\nSubject(s): Common, Labor<br \/>\nRuling: PR.L.CS. J\/41 L (11th)<br \/>\nSource: Federal Judicial Weekly<br \/>\nType: Precedent<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">PROVISIONAL SUSPENSION WITH RESTITUTORY EFFECTS. IT IS APPROPRIATE TO GRANT IT AGAINST THE FAILURE OF THE LABOR AUTHORITY TO CONTINUE WITH THE EXECUTION OF AN AWARD.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Constitutional Criminal Law The First Chamber declared unconstitutional Article 142, Section I, of the Banking Institutions Law, considering that it violates the right to privacy by allowing the Attorney General of the Republic or the public servant to whom powers are delegated to request banking information from financial institutions for criminal purposes without judicial [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1493","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-otros"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1493","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1493"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1493\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2561,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1493\/revisions\/2561"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1493"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1493"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibarrapg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1493"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}